This week the FDA approved
the expanded use of the cancer drug Keytruda for any solid tumor that expresses
a particular molecular marker. It is the first time that the FDA has
approved new uses of a cancer drug in cancers that are defined by a molecular
marker independent of the site in the body where the tumor originated. While
the expanded use of the drug was based on an accelerated approval supported by
surrogate markers, this is another demonstration of the FDA’s continuing
adaptation to the new era of precision medicine, in which the appropriate use
of a drug is defined by particular genetic and molecular markers rather than
the broad traditional disease categories.
Postscript to last
week’s post–– I wrote that the approval of Kalydeco for cystic fibrosis
patients with 23 additional mutations was, to my knowledge, the first time ever
that the FDA had approved new indications for a drug without any human clinical
data. The Kalydeco label change was based entirely on an in vitro assay of the
drug’s effect on the function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane receptor. The
in vitro assay had correlated well with clinical trial data from the original
Kalydeco studies and provided a reasonable degree of confidence that the drug
would work in the additional mutations tested. Later reports
and an additional statement from the FDA confirmed my initial conclusion
that this approval was indeed the first of its kind and a real breakthrough in
drug approval. That is good news for the approximately 900 cystic fibrosis
patients who have one of those 23 mutations. Of course the 900 patients covered
by the 23 additional mutations means that there is, on average, fewer than 40
patients with any one of those mutations, which is why the FDA’s flexibility is
so important. Precision medicine will need that kind of regulatory innovation
to move forward when, as the FDA’s Janet Woodcock stated, there is a solid
understanding of the disease’s biology, a drug with a known safety (and pharmacokinetic)
profile, and a good assay to predict the drug’s effect in target populations.
No comments:
Post a Comment