It is always safe to make
predictions about what the future will be like in ten years, because if it
turns out that you were wrong, the odds are no one will remember. If it turns out that you were right,
you can seize the opportunity to remind everyone of your remarkable prescience.
With that as prologue, I will start by revisiting a prediction I made sixteen
years ago about a date still six years from now. In April of 1998, at a
conference entitled NEXTMED: The Future of Medicine, I made a
prediction for the year 2020 (20/20 vision was a popular theme in the futurist
business back then). Actually I made several predictions, but I have carefully
selected the one which has the best chance of proving accurate. In my talk I
included the Ebola virus as an example of the progress I foresaw in our ability
to respond to future threats:
Immunology at
the Rainbow’s End: A Push-Button Vaccine Machine
It is a few years off, but
obviously the science of predicting protein structure from a gene sequence is
moving rapidly; and, well within the time frame spanned by this talk, it will
be a reality. At that point, the window will slam shut on the possibility of
our being overrun by a third-world virus, another HIV or, worse, a more
widespread and contagious Ebola. Within days of the first cases being picked
up, a blood sample of a victim would be sufficient to do a full genomic
analysis of the pathogen, the pathogen’s proteins would be fully analyzed both
for their function and their antigenicity, the most antigenic regions would
then be synthesized with an appropriate adjuvant, and a very effective vaccine
would be coming off the production line a week or two later.
In power point style, the prediction can be broken down this
way:
- 1. rapid sequencing of viral genomes from
early patient samples
- 2. rapid analysis of a viral pathogen’s proteins for function
- 3. rapid determination and selection of
antigenic regions of viral proteins
- 4. Rapid scale-up to produce an effective
vaccine within weeks after antigen selection
So, does it look as though I am going to be correct by 2020
or (deadlines for this sort of forecasting ought to be at least a bit flexible)
within a few years thereafter? Part one of my prediction seems to have already
arrived: Illumina’s sequencing machines, known for already delivering the
one thousand dollar human genome (in 30 hours), have also been used in
research that demonstrates the ability to identify
a viral pathogen’s genome in a clinical sample.
What about the ability to determine the function and
antigenicity of the pathogen’s proteins?
We are getting very close. Although
viral genome analysis can already identify the proteins on the viral envelope,
the routine ability to determine the antigenicity of the viral proteins
requires continued progress in in silico biology. In
silico biology, which is the ability to model biological systems on a
computer, is more than simply bioinformatics or computational biology. The
field is moving rapidly: two years ago, a group from Stanford University and
the J. Craig Venter Institute published
a report of an extraordinary scientific breakthrough, the computer
simulation of an entire organism, M. genitalium, a mycobacterial parasite that
is the cause of a sexually transmitted disease. However, in silico antigen prediction is more complicated, because it
requires not only modeling the virus but also modeling the human immune system.
Nevertheless, in silico approaches to
antigenicity prediction
have already been published. We are
not all the way there yet, but I am feeling good about the accuracy of
prediction three for the year 2020.
No comments:
Post a Comment